This time I want to use this space to reflect on the 25th Day of Reflection, Dialogue, and Prayer for Peace and Justice in the World, held last week at Assisi, Italy. Pope Benedict XVI invited representatives not only from the Christian world communions (including WCRC General Secretary Setri Nyomi), but also from the major religions of the world. Almost three hundred participants gathered to affirm their commitment to peace and justice at a time when the divisions in the world along ethnic, religious, and class lines are becoming increasingly felt.
What I found remarkable about this event is that it included among the participants people for whom faith is not yet or no longer a possibility, but who nevertheless desire to stand in solidarity with those who are inspired by their respective religions to pursue the values the event celebrated. In his address, Benedict devoted considerable space to characterizing this category of people. He designates them as “agnostics.” He distinguishes them from “atheists” in terms familiar to those among us who remember our first-year philosophy courses. Atheists assert that “there is no God.” But agnostics refuse to prescind from the possibility that God (or a god) exists. Instead, they ask questions of both sides. In this way, according to the Pope, they render a valuable service to the church and the world. I quote here in extenso an except from the address:
[Agnostics] take away from militant atheists the false certainty by which these claim to know that there is no God and they invite them to leave polemics aside and to become seekers who do not give up hope in the existence of truth and in the possibility and necessity of living by it. But they also challenge the followers of religions not to consider God as their own property, as if he belonged to them, in such a way that they feel vindicated in using force against others…
Let me venture to say that I have met already in the brief two months I have been in Geneva people who would categorize themselves as agnostics. These people do not react with hostility when I share with them what I am doing here with WCRC. In fact, often we find common ground; it often happens that the organizations for which they are working are engaged in projects that resemble those supported by WCRC. And I discover that they are no less dedicated to humanitarian causes than those I know with religious faith. So they are not (consciously?) motivated by faith in God, but would one dare say that they are not concerned with truth, even passionately so?
Arnold Come, an American theologian who studied with Karl Barth, has made observations about the relationship between the philosopher and theologian, observations that I think are apropos here. The philosopher and the theologian walk two different paths. But they must listen to each other because both are ordinary human beings who must live together in the same “room.” They are called to different tasks but by the same reality. Each one ought to be responsible to the “one and the same and only truth” while at the same time true to the responsibilities of his or her own undertaking. That is, the philosopher should aspire to be no more and no less than a philosopher. And the best thing the theologian can do for the philosopher is to be a theologian responsible to the theme that theology has: Jesus Christ as the light and hope of the world given by the God who is the creator of the world. (Arnold B. Come, “Advocatus Dei–Advocatus Hominis et Mundi,” in The Later Heidegger and Theology (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), 118. )