boundaries and gates, closure and disclosure

Soon after I arrived at the Ecumenical Center, I met Odair Pedroso Mateus. I learned that he had held the position of Executive Secretary of Theology and Ecumenism at the World Alliance of Reformed Churches (now WCRC) before Douwe Visser, whom I have been assisting, assumed it. Our encounter came to mind yesterday when I discovered at the WCC library a little book that  he had authored: Beyond Confessionalism: Essays on the Practice of Reformed Ecumenicity (Sao Paulo: Emblema, 2010). In the first chapter there is an arresting phrase worth pondering: “How has the Alliance articulated at crucial points in its history those particular bonds of communion…with the call to transform traditional confessional boundaries into gates of exchange of spiritual gifts?”

This is a perennial question that is relevant to all Christian world communions, or to any human group or organization for that matter. The struggle in opening ourselves to the other so that there may be a free and mutual giving and receiving lies in the ambivalence of the boundary itself.

On this phenomenon the Dutch pastoral psychologist Tjen van Knippenberg insightfully remarks that on the one hand, the boundary serve as protection, separating the strange from the familiar. When the boundary is crossed from the other side, this poses a threat and a danger. The presence of the other in our world necessarily alters it. It now has to be reconfigured to accommodate him or her. We experience this process as painful because we fear that it may mean we will no longer recognize our place in it. Our altered world will no longer have the familiar set of reference points by which we used to find our way around in it. But on the other hand, the boundary is also a challenge. The desire to break new ground animates the adventurous spirit. The other side of the boundary holds unknown horizons that invite exploration, that promise to open up new perspectives. Without the other, our world remains static, and we ourselves stagnate.

Knippenberg correctly observes that development is only possible when the self situates itself within the tension between stability and change. The self situates itself between a sense of security and openness as long as the boundary serves as closure and the site of disclosure.

What he says about the self applies equally to Christian world communions, including WCRC.





3 responses

  1. Good point Chris!
    It requires vulnerability to share one’s self, one’s thoughts and convictions with one another, with different communities, different faith traditions, or even a simple stranger. There is a risk involved, the risk of being changed; and that, can be frightening at times. However, the reward, to know “unknown horizons…that promise to open up new perspectives” is worth the risk. It has the potential to make our investment multiply and reproduce by 100% and it’s much better than the alternative–stagnation.

  2. Thanks Chris!! I used your timely Blog “boundaries and gates, closure and disclosure”
    for part of my Adult Sunday School lesson today (in an ELCA congregation) as we discussed how we are to “Be Church” to one another!!! Blessings!!! Cheri Roth

  3. Good article Chris. Last night I watched a documentary on ARTE about Lizt in which the musician who was commenting on Lizt’s work as a composer said that Lizt was not able to compose effectively when he was living in well-ordered, balanced surroundings. He needed unbalance and movement in order to be at his best as a composer. Somewhat analogous to your point about how Christians learn and grow best when they are outside the boundaries of the known and the balanced.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s